Agent SkillsAgent Skills
rohunj

test-and-break

@rohunj/test-and-break
rohunj
228
40 forks
Updated 3/31/2026
View on GitHub

Autonomous testing skill that opens a deployed app, goes through user flows, tries to break things, and writes detailed bug reports. Use after deploying to staging. Triggers on: test the app, find bugs, QA the deployment, break the app, test staging.

Installation

$npx agent-skills-cli install @rohunj/test-and-break
Claude Code
Cursor
Copilot
Codex
Antigravity

Details

Pathskills/test-and-break/SKILL.md
Branchmain
Scoped Name@rohunj/test-and-break

Usage

After installing, this skill will be available to your AI coding assistant.

Verify installation:

npx agent-skills-cli list

Skill Instructions


name: test-and-break description: "Autonomous testing skill that opens a deployed app, goes through user flows, tries to break things, and writes detailed bug reports. Use after deploying to staging. Triggers on: test the app, find bugs, QA the deployment, break the app, test staging."

Test and Break

Systematically test a deployed application by going through user flows, trying edge cases, and attempting to break things. Outputs structured bug reports that can be converted to user stories for autonomous fixing.


Prerequisites

  • agent-browser installed (npm install -g agent-browser && agent-browser install)
  • App deployed to a URL (staging/preview)
  • Basic understanding of what the app should do (read the PRD)

The Job

  1. Read the PRD to understand what the app should do
  2. Open the deployed app in agent-browser
  3. Go through each major user flow
  4. Try to break things at each step
  5. Document all bugs and issues found
  6. Output structured bug reports

Testing Process

Step 1: Understand the App

Read tasks/prd.md and tasks/architecture.md to understand:

  • What user flows exist
  • What the app should do
  • What the expected behavior is

Step 2: Open the App

agent-browser open [DEPLOYMENT_URL]
agent-browser snapshot -i

Step 3: Test Each User Flow

For each major feature/flow in the PRD:

A. Happy Path Testing

  1. Go through the flow as a normal user would
  2. Verify each step works as expected
  3. Check that success states appear correctly

B. Edge Case Testing

Try these at each input/interaction point:

Input Edge Cases:

  • Empty inputs (submit with nothing)
  • Very long text (500+ characters)
  • Special characters (<script>alert('xss')</script>, '; DROP TABLE users;--)
  • Unicode/emojis (πŸŽ‰, δΈ­ζ–‡, Ψ§Ω„ΨΉΨ±Ψ¨ΩŠΨ©)
  • Negative numbers where positive expected
  • Zero where non-zero expected
  • Future dates, past dates, invalid dates
  • Invalid email formats
  • Spaces only
  • Leading/trailing whitespace

Interaction Edge Cases:

  • Double-click buttons rapidly
  • Click back button during operations
  • Refresh page mid-flow
  • Open same page in multiple tabs
  • Submit form twice quickly

State Edge Cases:

  • Log out mid-operation (if auth exists)
  • Let session expire
  • Navigate directly to URLs that require prior steps
  • Use browser back/forward buttons

Visual/UX Issues:

  • Check mobile responsiveness (resize browser)
  • Look for overlapping elements
  • Check loading states exist
  • Verify error messages are helpful
  • Look for console errors

Step 4: Document Each Bug

For each issue found, document:

## BUG-XXX: [Short descriptive title]

**Severity:** Critical | High | Medium | Low
**Type:** Functional | UI/UX | Security | Performance | Accessibility

**Steps to Reproduce:**
1. Go to [URL]
2. Do [action]
3. Enter [input]
4. Click [button]

**Expected Behavior:**
[What should happen]

**Actual Behavior:**
[What actually happens]

**Screenshot:** [if applicable]

**Console Errors:** [if any]

**Notes:** [any additional context]

Severity Guidelines

SeverityDefinitionExamples
CriticalApp broken, data loss, security issueCrash, XSS vulnerability, data not saving
HighMajor feature broken, bad UXCan't complete main flow, confusing errors
MediumFeature works but has issuesMinor validation missing, UI glitches
LowPolish/minor issuesTypos, slight misalignment, minor UX

Output Format

Save bug report to tasks/bug-report-[date].md:

# Bug Report: [App Name]
**Tested:** [Date]
**URL:** [Deployment URL]
**Tester:** Claude (Automated)

## Summary
- Total bugs found: X
- Critical: X
- High: X
- Medium: X
- Low: X

## Critical Bugs
[List critical bugs first]

## High Priority Bugs
[List high bugs]

## Medium Priority Bugs
[List medium bugs]

## Low Priority Bugs
[List low bugs]

## Positive Findings
[List things that worked well - important for context]

## Recommendations
[Overall suggestions for improvement]

Converting Bugs to User Stories

After generating the bug report, convert each bug to a user story format:

{
  "id": "BUG-001",
  "title": "Fix: [Bug title]",
  "description": "As a user, I expect [expected behavior] but currently [actual behavior].",
  "acceptanceCriteria": [
    "Specific fix criterion 1",
    "Specific fix criterion 2",
    "Regression test: [original bug steps] no longer reproduces",
    "Typecheck passes"
  ],
  "priority": 1,
  "passes": false,
  "notes": "Original bug: [reference]"
}

Priority mapping:

  • Critical bugs β†’ priority 1-2
  • High bugs β†’ priority 3-5
  • Medium bugs β†’ priority 6-10
  • Low bugs β†’ priority 11+

Integration with Ralph

After generating bug stories, they can be:

  1. Added to existing prd.json - Append bug fixes to current project
  2. Create new prd.json - Start a bug-fix-only Ralph run

To add to existing prd.json:

# Read current max priority
MAX_PRIORITY=$(cat prd.json | jq '[.userStories[].priority] | max')

# Add bug stories starting after max priority
# (Claude should do this programmatically)

Example Testing Session

# 1. Open the app
agent-browser open https://my-app-staging.vercel.app

# 2. Take initial snapshot
agent-browser snapshot -i

# 3. Test login flow
agent-browser fill @e1 "test@example.com"
agent-browser fill @e2 "password123"
agent-browser click @e3
agent-browser wait --load networkidle
agent-browser snapshot -i

# 4. Try to break it
agent-browser fill @e1 ""  # empty email
agent-browser click @e3    # submit anyway
agent-browser snapshot -i  # check error handling

# 5. Try XSS
agent-browser fill @e1 "<script>alert('xss')</script>"
agent-browser snapshot -i

# Continue testing other flows...

Checklist

Before finishing testing:

  • Tested all user flows from PRD
  • Tried empty inputs on all forms
  • Tried special characters/XSS on all inputs
  • Checked mobile responsiveness
  • Looked for console errors
  • Verified error messages are helpful
  • Documented all bugs with reproduction steps
  • Assigned severity to each bug
  • Saved bug report to tasks/bug-report-[date].md

More by rohunj

View all
bugs-to-stories
228

Convert bug reports into prd.json user stories for autonomous fixing. Use after running test-and-break skill. Triggers on: convert bugs to stories, fix these bugs, add bugs to prd, create fix stories.

secrets-gitleaks
228

Hardcoded secret detection and prevention in git repositories and codebases using Gitleaks. Identifies passwords, API keys, tokens, and credentials through regex-based pattern matching and entropy analysis. Use when: (1) Scanning repositories for exposed secrets and credentials, (2) Implementing pre-commit hooks to prevent secret leakage, (3) Integrating secret detection into CI/CD pipelines, (4) Auditing codebases for compliance violations (PCI-DSS, SOC2, GDPR), (5) Establishing baseline secret detection and tracking new exposures, (6) Remediating historical secret exposures in git history.

sast-semgrep
228

Static application security testing (SAST) using Semgrep for vulnerability detection, security code review, and secure coding guidance with OWASP and CWE framework mapping. Use when: (1) Scanning code for security vulnerabilities across multiple languages, (2) Performing security code reviews with pattern-based detection, (3) Integrating SAST checks into CI/CD pipelines, (4) Providing remediation guidance with OWASP Top 10 and CWE mappings, (5) Creating custom security rules for organization-specific patterns, (6) Analyzing dependencies for known vulnerabilities.

story-quality
228

Review user stories for quality, proper sizing, sequencing, and acceptance criteria. Use before converting to prd.json. Triggers on: review stories, check user stories, story quality, validate stories.